Proposal #8
Referendum #15

Adjust tokenomics params to reflect difference in block time

Democracy
2yrs ago
5 Comments
NotPassed
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up 2
Share
Votes
51.5%Aye
Passing thresholdSuperMajorityApprove
48.5%Nay
Aye
25.92KPHA
Nay
24.42KPHA
Turnout
337.36KPHA
Electorate
0PHA
Failed
  • Metadata
  • Timeline2
  • Votes Bubble
Comments

Very reasonable, especially given the block time is not achievable by the Kusama validator throughputs.

Reply
Up

I hereby confirm that the Proposal and the Proposal Hash is correct. I've reproduced the same encoded proposal and hash on my own.

  • Encoded Call: 0x5d03045705508d976e1283c0aa0000000000000000fd7eb4062f0b000001000000000000000000000000000070080000000000000000000000000000003075000000000000255a8ed66500000000000000000000009d3473f8f34f030000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000033333333333333330000000000000000140000003b1c318036762473000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000008001000000000000000000000000000000320000000000000000000000000000000100000000000000
  • NotePreimage extrinsic on Subscan: https://khala.subscan.io/extrinsic/851551-21
  • Proposal Hash (from the extrinsic event): 0x3fb8adf8a43d49fefa480749bfba3a70c12ee707a2c0c7b171a842e5ee6d1b7d

Edited

Reply
Up

Agree

Reply
Up

We have to resubmit the proposal due to the wrong preimage encoding! Please don't vote or second it!

The encoding of this proposal is incorrect. We need to submit the "raw encoded proposal" instead of the polkadot.js prefixed version. Please don't second this proposal!

Details here: https://forum.phala.network/t/topic/3274/12

这个提案的call编码有问题,需要重新提交,请不要为此提案投票!

虽然提案的内容是正确的,但作为公投提案,必须提交call的原始编码,而不是polkadot.js生成的带前缀的编码。请不要second这个提案!

详情原因请见: https://forum.phala.network/t/topic/3274/12

Reply
Up

The resubmission: Proposal #9

请参见新的提案 #9

Reply
Up